The following guidelines and procedures are to be used in the evaluation of applications from Clinical Faculty for promotion. Candidates for promotion will be assessed and evaluated for accomplishment and excellence in five areas:
Clinical Faculty (non-compensated): The faculty members in this group are voluntary clinicians whose income is derived entirely from outside of the Medical School, such as the private practice of medicine or other sources. They are actively involved in teaching of medical students and house staff, and may do some research.
Departmental Clinical Faculty Personal Committee (CFPC): This Committee and its chair will be appointed by the Chair of the Department of Medicine. It will have representation from both Regular and Clinical faculty members of the Department on a rotating basis. The committee will consist of five or more members including its chair. The function of the CFPC is to review all appointments to the Clinical Faculty, make recommendations regarding new appointments, and recommend the appointment and/or deletion of current clinical faculty members to the Department Chair. All recommendations of this Committee are subject to the approval of the Department Chair, the Dean of the School of Medicine, and the Board of Regents of the University of Hawaiʻi.
The categories to be evaluated for promotion include, but are not limited to: teaching, clinical practice, research and other scholarly activities, leadership and value to the Department, School of Medicine, and University, and Community Service. An assessment for promotion will include evaluation of each of the categories that apply to the individual candidate.
Teaching
Teaching is a major mission of the Department and the non-compensated Clinical Faculty carry out a major part of the Departmental teaching, the following will be especially considered for Clinical Faculty promotions:
Clinical Practice
Research and other scholarly activities
In its broadest sense, research implies analysis, development, and reporting of new ways to improve health. Every patient or health care arrangement should be considered the subject of improvement and research. Areas included are “basic” bench research, clinical research, outcomes research, health services research, informatics, and research in methods of teaching. None is considered “better” than the other. Clinical faculty members are urged to engage in some research or other scholarly activities, but none is required for retention or promotion. Some examples include:
Service
Leadership
Evidence of ability to assume leadership and responsibility for various Departmental activities such as organization of courses, conducting teaching rounds or conferences, functioning as a tutor or facilitator in PBL units, and actively participating in Departmental, University or hospital committees or postgraduate courses.
Since teaching is the main function of the Clinical Faculty, emphasis will be placed on the teaching criterion for promotion. However, the other four criteria (Clinical practice, Research & other scholarly activities, Service, Leadership) will also be given consideration. Each of the five Criteria for Promotion will be evaluated by the following system:
5 | Outstanding |
4 |
Above Expectation |
3 | At Expectation |
2 | Below Expectation |
1 | Unsatisfactory |
0 | Detrimental to the Department, University, or Community |
- | Not applicable |
Grading requirements
Clinical Instructor |
Duties and Responsibilities:
Qualifications:
|
Assistant Clinical Professor |
Duties and Responsibilities:
Qualifications:
|
Associate Clinical Professor |
Duties and Responsibilities:
Qualifications:
|
Clinical Professor |
Duties and Responsibilities:
Qualifications:
|