Recommended writing order:
1) Tables and Figures
2) Results
3) Methods
4) Introduction
5) Discussion
6) Abstract (always do last)
TABLES AND FIGURES
RESULTS
METHODS
INTRODUCTION
Example:
Paragraph 1. Provide a brief background to establish context. (what’s known)
Paragraph 2. Identify knowledge gaps and constraints in previous research. (what’s unknown). Group similar studies and summarize at a high level. Refrain from incorporating intricate details, speculations, and criticisms of individual studies. If unsure, consider whether the information is essential to grasp your study question/aim or whether it would better suited for the Discussion.
Avoid needless repetition in the Introduction and Discussion; it wastes words and gives the impression that you had little to discuss and therefore used background material to fill space.
Paragraph 3. Provide a clear rationale for why you started the study and what new information it will reveal. (statement of purpose).
Example phrasing includes: “We hypothesized that”, “We aimed to”, “This paper describes,” “We asked whether”
Optional: Include one or two brief sentences about your experimental method. Explain how your study will fill the knowledge gaps and why your study matters. Do not describe methods, results, or conclusions. Note: some journals (though not common) may require you to summarize the main finding in the Introduction; always refer to specific guidelines or read a recent issue for example.
DISCUSSION
ABSTRACT
MISCELLANEOUS
(To obtain the password, please contact uhdomed@hawaii.edu.)
Example retrospective study: IRB-Example-Retrospective-Study_ro-1.pdf [password protected]
Research Project PHI guidelines: Research-Project-PHI-Guidelines202112-1-1.pdf [password protected]
View the full article here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638955/
The “presentation slide” is the building block of all academic presentations, whether they are journal clubs, thesis committee meetings, short conference talks, or hour-long seminars. A slide is a single page projected on a screen, usually built on the premise of a title, body, and figures or tables and includes both what is shown and what is spoken about that slide. Multiple slides are strung together to tell the larger story of the presentation. While there have been excellent 10 simple rules on giving entire presentations [1,2], there was an absence in the fine details of how to design a slide for optimal effect—such as the design elements that allow slides to convey meaningful information, to keep the audience engaged and informed, and to deliver the information intended and in the time frame allowed. As all research presentations seek to teach, effective slide design borrows from the same principles as effective teaching, including the consideration of cognitive processing your audience is relying on to organize, process, and retain information. This is written for anyone who needs to prepare slides from any length scale and for most purposes of conveying research to broad audiences. The rules are broken into 3 primary areas. Rules 1 to 5 are about optimizing the scope of each slide. Rules 6 to 8 are about principles around designing elements of the slide. Rules 9 to 10 are about preparing for your presentation, with the slides as the central focus of that preparation.
Figure 1: Example of implementing Rules 1-8 to improve a traditional, text-heavy slide
Naegle KM. Ten simple rules for effective presentation slides. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Dec 2;17(12):e1009554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009554. PMID: 34855746; PMCID: PMC8638955.